[A. d.

30-107. ] The seductive myth which represents this Father as the little child whom the Lord placed in the midst of his apostles (St.

Matt. xviii.

2) indicates at least the period when he may be supposed to have been born. That he and Polycarp were fellow-disciples under St.

John, is a tradition by no means inconsistent with anything in the Epistles of either. His subsequent history is sufficiently indicated in the Epistles which follow.

Had not the plan of this series been so exclusively that of a mere revised reprint, the writings of Ignatius themselves would have made me diffident as to the undertaking. It seems impossible for anyone to write upon the subject of these precious remains, without provoking controversy.

This publication is designed as an Eirenicon, and hence "few words are best," from one who might be supposed incapable of an unbiased opinion on most of the points which have been raised in connection with these Epistles. I must content myself therefore, by referring the studious reader to the originals as edited by Bishop Jacobson, with a Latin version and copious annotations.

That revered and learned divine honored me with his friendship; and his precious edition has been my frequent study, with theological students, almost ever since it appeared in 1840. It is by no means superannuated by the vigorous Ignatian literature which has since sprung up, and to which reference will he made elsewhere.

But I am content to leave the whole matter, without comment, to the minds of Christians of whatever school and to their independent conclusions. .